Claims denied by insurance companies
Has your insurer rejected your claim in whole or in part? At MataSeguros, we analyse the rejection and take action to ensure you get what you are entitled to.
Learn moreWe challenge your denied claim with evidence and a clear methodology
Whether your claim is denied due to alleged pre-existing conditions, lack of maintenance, inheritance issues, late payment of the insurance premium, incorrect classification of the loss, or a restrictive interpretation of the policy — or if the compensation is insufficient to carry out proper repairs — the MataSeguros team is here to help you with a wide range of solutions to review, claim, and maximize what you are entitled to.
Coverage, exclusions and limits applied
Review of rejected claims to determine whether the denial is based on a valid exclusion or on a disputable interpretation of the policy.
Casos Frecuentes
Rejection of compensation claims due to underinsurance
Ver caso detalladoIncorrect application of exclusions
Ver caso detalladoCompensation lower than the actual amount of damages
Ver caso detalladoProlonged delays without response
Ver caso detalladoRechazos de siniestros en viviendas heredadas o con el titular fallecido, donde la aseguradora alega falta de actualización de la póliza, errores formales o cambios de titularidad para no pagar. Analizamos si el rechazo es válido o una excusa técnica para evitar la indemnización.
Rejection of claims in inherited properties or properties where the policyholder has passed away, in which the insurer alleges lack of policy updates, formal errors, or changes in ownership in order to avoid payment. We analyze whether the rejection is valid or merely a technical excuse to deny compensation.Ver caso detalladoPROPERTY UNINHABITABILITY
The home cannot be used, but the insurer does not recognize this situation, requires invoices to provide alternative accommodation, or disputes that the property is uninhabitable.Ver caso detallado
Preguntas Frecuentes
The insurer closes the claim after the loss adjuster’s visit without paying compensation, alleging “lack of coverage,” “non-compensable damage,” or “insufficient damage,” without analyzing the true extent of the loss.